Papers › Leveraging High-Dimensional Side Information for Top-N Recommendation
Leveraging High-Dimensional Side Information for Top-N Recommendation
Yifan Chen, Xiang Zhao
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Top-N recommender systems typically utilize side information to address the problem of data sparsity. As nowadays side information is growing towards high dimensionality, the performances of existing methods deteriorate in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency, which imposes a severe technical challenge. In order to take advantage of high-dimensional side information, we propose in this paper an embedded feature selection method to facilitate top-N recommendation. In particular, we propose to learn feature weights of side information, where zero-valued features are naturally filtered out. We also introduce non-negativity and sparsity to the feature weights, to facilitate feature selection and encourage low-rank structure. Two optimization problems are accordingly put forward, respectively, where the feature selection is tightly or loosely coupled with the learning procedure. Augmented Lagrange Multiplier and Alternating Direction Method are applied to efficiently solve the problems. Experiment results demonstrate the superior recommendation quality of the proposed algorithm to that of the state-of-the-art alternatives.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections