Papers › Let's practice what we preach: Planning and interpreting simulation studies with...
Let's practice what we preach: Planning and interpreting simulation studies with design and analysis of experiments
Hugh Chipman, Derek Bingham
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Statisticians recommend the Design and Analysis of Experiments (DAE) for evidence-based research but often use tables to present their own simulation studies. Could DAE do better? We outline how DAE methods can be used to plan and analyze simulation studies. Tools for planning include fishbone diagrams, factorial and fractional factorial designs. Analysis is carried out via ANOVA, main-effect and interaction plots and other DAE tools. We also demonstrate how Taguchi Robust Parameter Design can be used to study the robustness of methods to a variety of uncontrollable population parameters.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections