Papers › Less is More: Efficient Black-box Attribution via Minimal Interpretable Subset Selection

Less is More: Efficient Black-box Attribution via Minimal Interpretable Subset Selection

1 Apr 2025arXiv:2504.00470archive 2025-07-28

Ruoyu Chen, Siyuan Liang, Jingzhi Li, Shiming Liu, Li Liu, Hua Zhang, Xiaochun Cao

To develop a trustworthy AI system, which aim to identify the input regions that most influence the models decisions. The primary task of existing attribution methods lies in efficiently and accurately identifying the relationships among input-prediction interactions. Particularly when the input data is discrete, such as images, analyzing the relationship between inputs and outputs poses a significant challenge due to the combinatorial explosion. In this paper, we propose a novel and efficient black-box attribution mechanism, LiMA (Less input is More faithful for Attribution), which reformulates the attribution of important regions as an optimization problem for submodular subset selection. First, to accurately assess interactions, we design a submodular function that quantifies subset importance and effectively captures their impact on decision outcomes. Then, efficiently ranking input sub-regions by their importance for attribution, we improve optimization efficiency through a novel bidirectional greedy search algorithm. LiMA identifies both the most and least important samples while ensuring an optimal attribution boundary that minimizes errors. Extensive experiments on eight foundation models demonstrate that our method provides faithful interpretations with fewer regions and exhibits strong generalization, shows an average improvement of 36.3% in Insertion and 39.6% in Deletion. Our method also outperforms the naive greedy search in attribution efficiency, being 1.6 times faster. Furthermore, when explaining the reasons behind model prediction errors, the average highest confidence achieved by our method is, on average, 86.1% higher than that of state-of-the-art attribution algorithms. The code is available at https://github.com/RuoyuChen10/LIMA.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2504.00470")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 7 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

RuoyuChen10/LIMA officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
ruoyuchen10/smdl-attribution mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
7unverified

Licence: 1 of the 8 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from RuoyuChen10/LIMA. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

perturbed RuoyuChen10/LIMA/baseline_attribution/debug_org_attribution_method_clip_rn101.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 4f3fa09e8a7e6b02 · report
perturbed RuoyuChen10/LIMA/baseline_attribution/debug_org_attribution_method_imagebind_vggsound.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 9254d53eb1047f0e · report
preprocess_input RuoyuChen10/LIMA/baseline_attribution/debug_org_attribution_method_clip_rn101.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 9c033200afa5fa21 · report
preprocess_input RuoyuChen10/LIMA/baseline_attribution/debug_org_attribution_method_imagebind_vggsound.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 91a062e7f2b9ebcc · report
preprocess_input RuoyuChen10/LIMA/baseline_attribution/debug_org_attribution_method_mambavision.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 26868c1d763a8351 · report
preprocess_input RuoyuChen10/LIMA/baseline_attribution/debug_org_attribution_method_swin.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 68be2c3ac63cb2ac · report
processing_sam_concepts RuoyuChen10/LIMA/SAM_mask_generate.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · d0c52e0acd45603b · report
Partition_by_patch identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · 4e71c97a79591777 · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections