Papers › Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approach

Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approach

5 Oct 2020ICLR 2021 1arXiv:2010.02347archive 2025-07-28

Hao Cheng, Zhaowei Zhu, Xingyu Li, Yifei Gong, Xing Sun, Yang Liu

Human-annotated labels are often prone to noise, and the presence of such noise will degrade the performance of the resulting deep neural network (DNN) models. Much of the literature (with several recent exceptions) of learning with noisy labels focuses on the case when the label noise is independent of features. Practically, annotations errors tend to be instance-dependent and often depend on the difficulty levels of recognizing a certain task. Applying existing results from instance-independent settings would require a significant amount of estimation of noise rates. Therefore, providing theoretically rigorous solutions for learning with instance-dependent label noise remains a challenge. In this paper, we propose CORES² (COnfidence REgularized Sample Sieve), which progressively sieves out corrupted examples. The implementation of CORES² does not require specifying noise rates and yet we are able to provide theoretical guarantees of CORES² in filtering out the corrupted examples. This high-quality sample sieve allows us to treat clean examples and the corrupted ones separately in training a DNN solution, and such a separation is shown to be advantageous in the instance-dependent noise setting. We demonstrate the performance of CORES² on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets with synthetic instance-dependent label noise and Clothing1M with real-world human noise. As of independent interests, our sample sieve provides a generic machinery for anatomizing noisy datasets and provides a flexible interface for various robust training techniques to further improve the performance. Code is available at https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/cores.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2010.02347")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract.

By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

UCSC-REAL/cores officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · violated contract
2unverified

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from UCSC-REAL/cores. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

f_beta UCSC-REAL/cores/loss.py official repository ran · honoured contract fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 66e2df8b49609716 · report
get_noise_pred ucsc-real/cores/phase1.py official repository ran · violated contract no licence file found · pointer only · 08c40c52150e5ee8 · report
accuracy ucsc-real/cores/phase1.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 12130d8056932840 · report
loss_cores UCSC-REAL/cores/loss.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · b703cc7763eaf4e4 · report

Tasks

Image ClassificationImage Classification with Label NoiseLearning with noisy labels

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification Clothing1M CORES2 Accuracy 73.24% #33 of 51 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-100N CORES Accuracy (mean) 61.15 #9 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-100N CORES* Accuracy (mean) 55.72 #22 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Aggregate CORES* Accuracy (mean) 95.25 #6 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Aggregate CORES Accuracy (mean) 91.23 #17 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random1 CORES* Accuracy (mean) 94.45 #6 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random1 CORES Accuracy (mean) 89.66 #18 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random2 CORES* Accuracy (mean) 94.88 #4 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random2 CORES Accuracy (mean) 89.91 #13 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random3 CORES* Accuracy (mean) 94.74 #4 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random3 CORES Accuracy (mean) 89.79 #14 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Worst CORES* Accuracy (mean) 91.66 #7 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Worst CORES Accuracy (mean) 83.60 #12 of 25 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections