Papers › Learning to Plan via Supervised Contrastive Learning and Strategic Interpolation: A...

Learning to Plan via Supervised Contrastive Learning and Strategic Interpolation: A Chess Case Study

5 Jun 2025arXiv:2506.04892archive 2025-07-28

Andrew Hamara, Greg Hamerly, Pablo Rivas, Andrew C. Freeman

Modern chess engines achieve superhuman performance through deep tree search and regressive evaluation, while human players rely on intuition to select candidate moves followed by a shallow search to validate them. To model this intuition-driven planning process, we train a transformer encoder using supervised contrastive learning to embed board states into a latent space structured by positional evaluation. In this space, distance reflects evaluative similarity, and visualized trajectories display interpretable transitions between game states. We demonstrate that move selection can occur entirely within this embedding space by advancing toward favorable regions, without relying on deep search. Despite using only a 6-ply beam search, our model achieves an estimated Elo rating of 2593. Performance improves with both model size and embedding dimensionality, suggesting that latent planning may offer a viable alternative to traditional search. Although we focus on chess, the proposed embedding-based planning method can be generalized to other perfect-information games where state evaluations are learnable. All source code is available at https://github.com/andrewhamara/SOLIS.

PaperPDFCode

Code

andrewhamara/solis officialmentioned in paperjax report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Contrastive Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Contrastive LearningFocus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections