Papers › Learning to ignore: rethinking attention in CNNs
Learning to ignore: rethinking attention in CNNs
Firas Laakom, Kateryna Chumachenko, Jenni Raitoharju, Alexandros Iosifidis, Moncef Gabbouj
Recently, there has been an increasing interest in applying attention mechanisms in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to solve computer vision tasks. Most of these methods learn to explicitly identify and highlight relevant parts of the scene and pass the attended image to further layers of the network. In this paper, we argue that such an approach might not be optimal. Arguably, explicitly learning which parts of the image are relevant is typically harder than learning which parts of the image are less relevant and, thus, should be ignored. In fact, in vision domain, there are many easy-to-identify patterns of irrelevant features. For example, image regions close to the borders are less likely to contain useful information for a classification task. Based on this idea, we propose to reformulate the attention mechanism in CNNs to learn to ignore instead of learning to attend. Specifically, we propose to explicitly learn irrelevant information in the scene and suppress it in the produced representation, keeping only important attributes. This implicit attention scheme can be incorporated into any existing attention mechanism. In this work, we validate this idea using two recent attention methods Squeeze and Excitation (SE) block and Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM). Experimental results on different datasets and model architectures show that learning to ignore, i.e., implicit attention, yields superior performance compared to the standard approaches.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections