Papers › Learning to Dynamically Select Cost Optimal Schedulers in Cloud Computing Environments
Learning to Dynamically Select Cost Optimal Schedulers in Cloud Computing Environments
Shreshth Tuli, Giuliano Casale, Nicholas R. Jennings
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The operational cost of a cloud computing platform is one of the most significant Quality of Service (QoS) criteria for schedulers, crucial to keep up with the growing computational demands. Several data-driven deep neural network (DNN)-based schedulers have been proposed in recent years that outperform alternative approaches by providing scalable and effective resource management for dynamic workloads. However, state-of-the-art schedulers rely on advanced DNNs with high computational requirements, implying high scheduling costs. In non-stationary contexts, the most sophisticated schedulers may not always be required, and it may be sufficient to rely on low-cost schedulers to temporarily save operational costs. In this work, we propose MetaNet, a surrogate model that predicts the operational costs and scheduling overheads of a large number of DNN-based schedulers and chooses one on-the-fly to jointly optimize job scheduling and execution costs. This facilitates improvements in execution costs, energy usage and service level agreement violations of up to 11%, 43% and 13% compared to the state-of-the-art methods.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections