Papers › Learning to Drop Points for LiDAR Scan Synthesis
Learning to Drop Points for LiDAR Scan Synthesis
Kazuto Nakashima, Ryo Kurazume
3D laser scanning by LiDAR sensors plays an important role for mobile robots to understand their surroundings. Nevertheless, not all systems have high resolution and accuracy due to hardware limitations, weather conditions, and so on. Generative modeling of LiDAR data as scene priors is one of the promising solutions to compensate for unreliable or incomplete observations. In this paper, we propose a novel generative model for learning LiDAR data based on generative adversarial networks. As in the related studies, we process LiDAR data as a compact yet lossless representation, a cylindrical depth map. However, despite the smoothness of real-world objects, many points on the depth map are dropped out through the laser measurement, which causes learning difficulty on generative models. To circumvent this issue, we introduce measurement uncertainty into the generation process, which allows the model to learn a disentangled representation of the underlying shape and the dropout noises from a collection of real LiDAR data. To simulate the lossy measurement, we adopt a differentiable sampling framework to drop points based on the learned uncertainty. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on synthesis and reconstruction tasks using two datasets. We further showcase potential applications by restoring LiDAR data with various types of corruption.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections