Papers › Learning to detect RFI in radio astronomy without seeing it
Learning to detect RFI in radio astronomy without seeing it
Michael Mesarcik, Albert-Jan Boonstra, Elena Ranguelova, Rob V. van Nieuwpoort
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) corrupts astronomical measurements, thus affecting the performance of radio telescopes. To address this problem, supervised segmentation models have been proposed as candidate solutions to RFI detection. However, the unavailability of large labelled datasets, due to the prohibitive cost of annotating, makes these solutions unusable. To solve these shortcomings, we focus on the inverse problem; training models on only uncontaminated emissions thereby learning to discriminate RFI from all known astronomical signals and system noise. We use Nearest-Latent-Neighbours (NLN) - an algorithm that utilises both the reconstructions and latent distances to the nearest-neighbours in the latent space of generative autoencoding models for novelty detection. The uncontaminated regions are selected using weak-labels in the form of RFI flags (generated by classical RFI flagging methods) available from most radio astronomical data archives at no additional cost. We evaluate performance on two independent datasets, one simulated from the HERA telescope and another consisting of real observations from LOFAR telescope. Additionally, we provide a small expert-labelled LOFAR dataset (i.e., strong labels) for evaluation of our and other methods. Performance is measured using AUROC, AUPRC and the maximum F1-score for a fixed threshold. For the simulated data we outperform the current state-of-the-art by approximately 1% in AUROC and 3% in AUPRC for the HERA dataset. Furthermore, our algorithm offers both a 4% increase in AUROC and AUPRC at a cost of a degradation in F1-score performance for the LOFAR dataset, without any manual labelling.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections