Papers › Learning to Ask Questions in Open-domain Conversational Systems with Typed Decoders

Learning to Ask Questions in Open-domain Conversational Systems with Typed Decoders

13 May 2018ACL 2018 7arXiv:1805.04843archive 2025-07-28

Yansen Wang, Chen-Yi Liu, Minlie Huang, Liqiang Nie

Asking good questions in large-scale, open-domain conversational systems is quite significant yet rather untouched. This task, substantially different from traditional question generation, requires to question not only with various patterns but also on diverse and relevant topics. We observe that a good question is a natural composition of {\it interrogatives}, {\it topic words}, and {\it ordinary words}. Interrogatives lexicalize the pattern of questioning, topic words address the key information for topic transition in dialogue, and ordinary words play syntactical and grammatical roles in making a natural sentence. We devise two typed decoders (\textit{soft typed decoder} and \textit{hard typed decoder}) in which a type distribution over the three types is estimated and used to modulate the final generation distribution. Extensive experiments show that the typed decoders outperform state-of-the-art baselines and can generate more meaningful questions.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

victorywys/Learning2Ask_TypedDecoder officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

DecoderQuestion GenerationQuestion-GenerationSentence

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections