Papers › Learning in Wilson-Cowan model for metapopulation
Learning in Wilson-Cowan model for metapopulation
Raffaele Marino, Lorenzo Buffoni, Lorenzo Chicchi, Francesca Di Patti, Diego Febbe, Lorenzo Giambagli, Duccio Fanelli
The Wilson-Cowan model for metapopulation, a Neural Mass Network Model, treats different subcortical regions of the brain as connected nodes, with connections representing various types of structural, functional, or effective neuronal connectivity between these regions. Each region comprises interacting populations of excitatory and inhibitory cells, consistent with the standard Wilson-Cowan model. By incorporating stable attractors into such a metapopulation model's dynamics, we transform it into a learning algorithm capable of achieving high image and text classification accuracy. We test it on MNIST and Fashion MNIST, in combination with convolutional neural networks, on CIFAR-10 and TF-FLOWERS, and, in combination with a transformer architecture (BERT), on IMDB, always showing high classification accuracy. These numerical evaluations illustrate that minimal modifications to the Wilson-Cowan model for metapopulation can reveal unique and previously unobserved dynamics.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | CNN+ Wilson-Cowan model RNN | Percentage correct | 86.59 | #227 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Fashion-MNIST | CNN+ Wilson-Cowan model RNN | Accuracy | 91.35 | #27 of 34 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Fashion-MNIST | Wilson-Cowan model RNN | Accuracy | 88.39 | #30 of 34 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Flowers (Tensorflow) | CNN+ Wilson-Cowan model RNN | Accuracy | 84.85 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | MNIST | CNN+ Wilson-Cowan model RNN | Accuracy | 99.31 | #68 of 81 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | MNIST | Wilson-Cowan model RNN | Accuracy | 98.13 | #74 of 81 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | IMDb | Bert+ Wilson-Cowan model RNN | Accuracy | 87.46 | #42 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections