Papers › Learning Grounded Vision-Language Representation for Versatile Understanding in...
Learning Grounded Vision-Language Representation for Versatile Understanding in Untrimmed Videos
Teng Wang, Jinrui Zhang, Feng Zheng, Wenhao Jiang, Ran Cheng, Ping Luo
Joint video-language learning has received increasing attention in recent years. However, existing works mainly focus on single or multiple trimmed video clips (events), which makes human-annotated event boundaries necessary during inference. To break away from the ties, we propose a grounded vision-language learning framework for untrimmed videos, which automatically detects informative events and effectively excavates the alignments between multi-sentence descriptions and corresponding event segments. Instead of coarse-level video-language alignments, we present two dual pretext tasks to encourage fine-grained segment-level alignments, i.e., text-to-event grounding (TEG) and event-to-text generation (ETG). TEG learns to adaptively ground the possible event proposals given a set of sentences by estimating the cross-modal distance in a joint semantic space. Meanwhile, ETG aims to reconstruct (generate) the matched texts given event proposals, encouraging the event representation to retain meaningful semantic information. To encourage accurate label assignment between the event set and the text set, we propose a novel semantic-aware cost to mitigate the sub-optimal matching results caused by ambiguous boundary annotations. Our framework is easily extensible to tasks covering visually-grounded language understanding and generation. We achieve state-of-the-art dense video captioning performance on ActivityNet Captions, YouCook2 and YouMakeup, and competitive performance on several other language generation and understanding tasks. Our method also achieved 1st place in both the MTVG and MDVC tasks of the PIC 4th Challenge. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/zjr2000/GVL.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2303.06378")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 11 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: official repository: 12 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 11 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from zjr2000/gvl. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
81aab88321de62c2 · report
53e64888999b6cb7 · report
cc29ecc7589efdff · report
85e25c640a683e5a · report
0f585e754688f3eb · report
fe5aa6f8364bdae4 · report
931c2ee1f4c9cd81 · report
c6a05eda2a29c456 · report
004b519990491671 · report
a45f62024eb3d2c5 · report
930f6b6986cf84bf · report
956db474f5613b75 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections