Papers › Learning from Ambiguous Labels for Lung Nodule Malignancy Prediction

Learning from Ambiguous Labels for Lung Nodule Malignancy Prediction

23 Apr 2021arXiv:2104.11436archive 2025-07-28

Zehui Liao, Yutong Xie, Shishuai Hu, Yong Xia

Lung nodule malignancy prediction is an essential step in the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Besides the difficulties commonly discussed, the challenges of this task also come from the ambiguous labels provided by annotators, since deep learning models may learn, even amplify, the bias embedded in them. In this paper, we propose a multi-view "divide-and-rule" (MV-DAR) model to learn from both reliable and ambiguous annotations for lung nodule malignancy prediction. According to the consistency and reliability of their annotations, we divide nodules into three sets: a consistent and reliable set (CR-Set), an inconsistent set (IC-Set), and a low reliable set (LR-Set). The nodule in IC-Set is annotated by multiple radiologists inconsistently, and the nodule in LR-Set is annotated by only one radiologist. The proposed MV-DAR contains three DAR submodels to characterize a lung nodule from three orthographic views. Each DAR consists of a prediction network (Prd-Net), a counterfactual network (CF-Net), and a low reliable network (LR-Net), learning on CR-Set, IC-Set, and LR-Set, respectively. The image representation ability learned by CF-Net and LR-Net is then transferred to Prd-Net by negative-attention module (NA-Module) and consistent-attention module (CA-Module), aiming to boost the prediction ability of Prd-Net. The MV-DAR model has been evaluated on the LIDC-IDRI dataset and LUNGx dataset. Our results indicate not only the effectiveness of the proposed MV-DAR model in learning from ambiguous labels but also its superiority over present noisy label-learning models in lung nodule malignancy prediction.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Merrical/DAR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections