Papers › Learning Emotion Representations from Verbal and Nonverbal Communication
Learning Emotion Representations from Verbal and Nonverbal Communication
Sitao Zhang, Yimu Pan, James Z. Wang
Emotion understanding is an essential but highly challenging component of artificial general intelligence. The absence of extensively annotated datasets has significantly impeded advancements in this field. We present EmotionCLIP, the first pre-training paradigm to extract visual emotion representations from verbal and nonverbal communication using only uncurated data. Compared to numerical labels or descriptions used in previous methods, communication naturally contains emotion information. Furthermore, acquiring emotion representations from communication is more congruent with the human learning process. We guide EmotionCLIP to attend to nonverbal emotion cues through subject-aware context encoding and verbal emotion cues using sentiment-guided contrastive learning. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness and transferability of EmotionCLIP. Using merely linear-probe evaluation protocol, EmotionCLIP outperforms the state-of-the-art supervised visual emotion recognition methods and rivals many multimodal approaches across various benchmarks. We anticipate that the advent of EmotionCLIP will address the prevailing issue of data scarcity in emotion understanding, thereby fostering progress in related domains. The code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/Xeaver/EmotionCLIP.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2305.13500")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 29 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 19 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 8 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 29 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
29 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 19 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 29 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Xeaver/EmotionCLIP. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
c31ea380cbe12461 · report
317eeb922af6df8c · report
147cc99e5a62df69 · report
521eb383ee0b590c · report
72ae1815d1a81517 · report
698e12b8a3909d01 · report
02d6e69496cfde7c · report
c857cf6246801938 · report
ee61c52d701d0844 · report
4414627a34d3f5a6 · report
bd68a70f00670d88 · report
4e3b3a6334554db6 · report
83d96ef6b277e8b1 · report
e16cbf2cae362701 · report
304f8d104c3ae85b · report
22f55504153a6c4a · report
5117c4f71e3e05f2 · report
908004750488edf4 · report
982a5d4308b89326 · report
fffd8407fb58896e · report
8fce15b73d85523c · report
ea7b78f323af0b60 · report
617c4c27e5687338 · report
507b8fae3df11365 · report
a13c7ce400fe0bd9 · report
4a6f84446e0450a6 · report
7433c55c64017801 · report
e037cf75b0da50f6 · report
6907192b23bf18d8 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotion Recognition in Context | BoLD | EmotionCLIP(linear-probe evaluation) | AUC | 69.30 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Emotion Recognition in Context | BoLD | EmotionCLIP(linear-probe evaluation) | Average mAP | 22.51 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Emotion Recognition in Context | EMOTIC | EmotionCLIP(linear-probe evaluation) | mAP | 32.91 | #3 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections