Papers › Learning Broken Symmetries with Resimulation and Encouraged Invariance
Learning Broken Symmetries with Resimulation and Encouraged Invariance
Edmund Witkowski, Daniel Whiteson
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Recognizing symmetries in data allows for significant boosts in neural network training. In many cases, however, the underlying symmetry is present only in an idealized dataset, and is broken in the training data, due to effects such as arbitrary and/or non-uniform detector bin edges. Standard approaches, such as data augmentation or equivariant networks fail to represent the nature of the full, broken symmetry. We introduce a novel data-augmentation scheme that respects the true underlying symmetry and avoids artifacts by augmenting the training set with transformed pre-detector examples whose detector response is then resimulated. In addition, we encourage the network to treat the augmented copies identically, allowing it to learn the broken symmetry. While the technique can be extended to other symmetries, we demonstrate its application on rotational symmetry in particle physics calorimeter images. We find that neural networks trained with pre-detector rotations converge to a solution more quickly than networks trained with standard post-detector augmentation, and that networks modified to encourage similar internal treatment of augmentations of the same input converge even faster.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections