Papers › Learning Best Combination for Efficient N:M Sparsity
Learning Best Combination for Efficient N:M Sparsity
Yuxin Zhang, Mingbao Lin, Zhihang Lin, Yiting Luo, Ke Li, Fei Chao, Yongjian Wu, Rongrong Ji
By forcing at most N out of M consecutive weights to be non-zero, the recent N:M network sparsity has received increasing attention for its two attractive advantages: 1) Promising performance at a high sparsity. 2) Significant speedups on NVIDIA A100 GPUs. Recent studies require an expensive pre-training phase or a heavy dense-gradient computation. In this paper, we show that the N:M learning can be naturally characterized as a combinatorial problem which searches for the best combination candidate within a finite collection. Motivated by this characteristic, we solve N:M sparsity in an efficient divide-and-conquer manner. First, we divide the weight vector into C_Mᴺ combination subsets of a fixed size N. Then, we conquer the combinatorial problem by assigning each combination a learnable score that is jointly optimized with its associate weights. We prove that the introduced scoring mechanism can well model the relative importance between combination subsets. And by gradually removing low-scored subsets, N:M fine-grained sparsity can be efficiently optimized during the normal training phase. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our learning best combination (LBC) performs consistently better than off-the-shelf N:M sparsity methods across various networks. Our project is released at \url{https://github.com/zyxxmu/LBC}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections