Papers › Learn2Reg: comprehensive multi-task medical image registration challenge, dataset and...
Learn2Reg: comprehensive multi-task medical image registration challenge, dataset and evaluation in the era of deep learning
Alessa Hering, Lasse Hansen, Tony C. W. Mok, Albert C. S. Chung, Hanna Siebert, Stephanie Häger, Annkristin Lange, Sven Kuckertz, Stefan Heldmann, Wei Shao, Sulaiman Vesal, Mirabela Rusu, Geoffrey Sonn, Théo Estienne, Maria Vakalopoulou, Luyi Han, Yunzhi Huang, Pew-Thian Yap, Mikael Brudfors, Yaël Balbastre, Samuel Joutard, Marc Modat, Gal Lifshitz, Dan Raviv, Jinxin Lv, Qiang Li, Vincent Jaouen, Dimitris Visvikis, Constance Fourcade, Mathieu Rubeaux, Wentao Pan, Zhe Xu, Bailiang Jian, Francesca De Benetti, Marek Wodzinski, Niklas Gunnarsson, Jens Sjölund, Daniel Grzech, Huaqi Qiu, Zeju Li, Alexander Thorley, Jinming Duan, Christoph Großbröhmer, Andrew Hoopes, Ingerid Reinertsen, Yiming Xiao, Bennett Landman, Yuankai Huo, Keelin Murphy, Nikolas Lessmann, Bram van Ginneken, Adrian V. Dalca, Mattias P. Heinrich
Image registration is a fundamental medical image analysis task, and a wide variety of approaches have been proposed. However, only a few studies have comprehensively compared medical image registration approaches on a wide range of clinically relevant tasks. This limits the development of registration methods, the adoption of research advances into practice, and a fair benchmark across competing approaches. The Learn2Reg challenge addresses these limitations by providing a multi-task medical image registration data set for comprehensive characterisation of deformable registration algorithms. A continuous evaluation will be possible at https://learn2reg.grand-challenge.org. Learn2Reg covers a wide range of anatomies (brain, abdomen, and thorax), modalities (ultrasound, CT, MR), availability of annotations, as well as intra- and inter-patient registration evaluation. We established an easily accessible framework for training and validation of 3D registration methods, which enabled the compilation of results of over 65 individual method submissions from more than 20 unique teams. We used a complementary set of metrics, including robustness, accuracy, plausibility, and runtime, enabling unique insight into the current state-of-the-art of medical image registration. This paper describes datasets, tasks, evaluation methods and results of the challenge, as well as results of further analysis of transferability to new datasets, the importance of label supervision, and resulting bias. While no single approach worked best across all tasks, many methodological aspects could be identified that push the performance of medical image registration to new state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, we demystified the common belief that conventional registration methods have to be much slower than deep-learning-based methods.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections