Papers › Lazarus Stars: Numerical investigations of stellar evolution with star-lifting as a...
Lazarus Stars: Numerical investigations of stellar evolution with star-lifting as a life extension strategy
Matthew T. Scoggins, David Kipping
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The aging and gradual brightening of the Sun will challenge Earth's habitability in the next few billion years. If life exists elsewhere in the Universe, the aging of its host star similarly poses an existential threat. One solution, which we dub a Lazarus star, is for an advanced civilization to remove (or star-lift) mass from their host star at a rate that offsets the increase in luminosity, keeping the flux on the habitable planet(s) constant and extending the lifetime of their star. While this idea has existed since 1985 when it was first proposed by Criswell, numerical investigations of star-lifting have been lacking. Here, we use the stellar evolution code MESA to find mass vs. age and Ṁ vs. age relations which would hold the flux on surrounding planets constant. We explore initial mass ranging from 0.2M_⊙ to 1.2M_⊙. For most stars with a mass initially below about 0.4 M_⊙, we find that star-lifting increases their main-sequence lifetimes up to $500$ Gyr until they approach the hydrogen burning limit and star-lifting is no longer possible. For more massive stars, star-lifting increase main-sequence lifetimes by 1 Gyr to 100 Gyr, though they still enter the red-giant phase. For example, a Sun-like star has a main-sequence lifetime which can be increased by up to 3 Gyr. This requires a mass-loss rate of about 0.05 M_(Ceres) per year. We compare star-lifting to other survival strategies and briefly discuss methods for detecting these engineered stars.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections