Papers › Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methods

Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methods

27 Oct 2021NeurIPS 2021 12arXiv:2110.14446archive 2025-07-28

Derek Lim, Felix Hohne, Xiuyu Li, Sijia Linda Huang, Vaishnavi Gupta, Omkar Bhalerao, Ser-Nam Lim

Many widely used datasets for graph machine learning tasks have generally been homophilous, where nodes with similar labels connect to each other. Recently, new Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been developed that move beyond the homophily regime; however, their evaluation has often been conducted on small graphs with limited application domains. We collect and introduce diverse non-homophilous datasets from a variety of application areas that have up to 384x more nodes and 1398x more edges than prior datasets. We further show that existing scalable graph learning and graph minibatching techniques lead to performance degradation on these non-homophilous datasets, thus highlighting the need for further work on scalable non-homophilous methods. To address these concerns, we introduce LINKX -- a strong simple method that admits straightforward minibatch training and inference. Extensive experimental results with representative simple methods and GNNs across our proposed datasets show that LINKX achieves state-of-the-art performance for learning on non-homophilous graphs. Our codes and data are available at https://github.com/CUAI/Non-Homophily-Large-Scale.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2110.14446")

Code

Syntology Ran 7 of 21 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 14 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 6 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 21 samples from 3 repositories, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

cuai/non-homophily-large-scale officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
ivam-he/chebnetii mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
kkhuang81/AdaptKry mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
kkhuang81/UniFilter mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

21 samples harvested; 7 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 14 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
6ran
14unverified

Licence: 4 of the 21 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Combination kkhuang81/UniFilter/non-homo/models.py community (archive-listed) ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 91c76597ab622382 · report
Dense kkhuang81/UniFilter/non-homo/models.py community (archive-listed) ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic MIT (permissive) · 382d674885c1d7a8 · report
GFK kkhuang81/UniFilter/non-homo/models.py community (archive-listed) ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic MIT (permissive) · aefb7362513b6d9c · report
MLP kkhuang81/UniFilter/non-homo/models.py community (archive-listed) ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 1ec411235e21d6aa · report
MLP ivam-he/chebnetii/non-homophilous/models.py community (archive-listed) ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic no licence file found · pointer only · 65a58883cfe40082 · report
cheby ivam-he/chebnetii/non-homophilous/models.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract no licence file found · pointer only · d7653b0093307e2d · report
to_planetoid CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/data_utils.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 7e85cbb79f6726cb · report
ChebNetII_V ivam-he/chebnetii/non-homophilous/models.py community (archive-listed) unverified no licence file found · pointer only · c57ba20da37784b4 · report
ChebnetII_prop ivam-he/chebnetii/non-homophilous/models.py community (archive-listed) unverified no licence file found · pointer only · bb80980e3fb3c30c · report
compat_matrix CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/homophily.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 606e13d2f58cd737 · report
edge_homophily CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/homophily.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 07270c9ae73d7519 · report
even_quantile_labels CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/data_utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 919cb6dbf2c173bb · report
general_outcome_correlation CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/correct_smooth.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 10001c8b8b43dfbc · report
load_fb100 CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/load_data.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · ab0d9da60756efc3 · report
load_twitch CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/load_data.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 563a5ce4dce55a17 · report
node_homophily CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/homophily.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 42ea8a2b9adf3c0e · report
pre_outcome_correlation CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/correct_smooth.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 46e8aa0d0cec5dee · report
pre_residual_correlation CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/correct_smooth.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · cce358b08f0d5b50 · report
rand_train_test_idx CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/data_utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 13234652741e2264 · report
test CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/gcn-ogbn-proteins.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 38233058d8c3af1b · report
train CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks/gcn-ogbn-proteins.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · fcac6adae654a353 · report

Tasks

Graph LearningNode ClassificationNode Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

Penn94geniustwitch-gamers

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Node Classification Actor LINKX Accuracy 36.10 ± 1.55 #41 of 62 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Chameleon LINKX Accuracy 68.42 ± 1.38 #39 of 61 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Citeseer (48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 73.19 ± 0.99 #25 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Cora (48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 84.64 ± 1.13 #24 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Cornell LINKX Accuracy 77.84 ± 5.81 #45 of 60 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Penn94 LINKX Accuracy 84.71 ± 0.52 #11 of 32 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification PubMed (48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 87.86 ± 0.77 #23 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Squirrel LINKX Accuracy 61.81 ± 1.80 #24 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Texas LINKX Accuracy 74.60 ± 8.37 #54 of 62 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Wisconsin LINKX Accuracy 75.49 ± 5.72 #56 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification arXiv-year LINKX Accuracy 56.00±1.34 #7 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification genius LINKX Accuracy 90.77 ± 0.27 #8 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification pokec LINKX Accuracy 82.04±0.07 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification twitch-gamers LINKX Accuracy 66.06±0.19 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification wiki LINKX ACCURACY 59.80±0.41 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Chameleon (48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 68.42 ± 1.38  #16 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Cornell (48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy  77.84 ± 5.81  #22 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Film(48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 36.10 ± 1.55  #17 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Penn94 LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 84.71 ± 0.52 #7 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Penn94 GCNJK 1:1 Accuracy 81.63 ± 0.54 #13 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Penn94 LINK 1:1 Accuracy 80.79 ± 0.49 #17 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Penn94 GATJK 1:1 Accuracy 80.69 ± 0.36 #18 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Penn94 L Prop 2-hop 1:1 Accuracy 74.13 ± 0.46 #25 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Penn94 L Prop 1-hop 1:1 Accuracy 63.21 ± 0.39 #28 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Squirrel (48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 61.81 ± 1.80 #9 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Texas (48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 74.60 ± 8.37  #23 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs Wisconsin (48%/32%/20% fixed splits) LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 75.49 ± 5.72 #23 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs genius LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 90.77 ± 0.27 #10 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs genius GCNJK 1:1 Accuracy 89.30 ± 0.19 #15 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs genius MLP 1:1 Accuracy 86.68 ± 0.09 #17 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs genius LINK 1:1 Accuracy 73.56 ± 0.14 #23 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs genius L Prop 2-hop 1:1 Accuracy 67.04 ± 0.20 #24 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs genius L Prop 1-hop 1:1 Accuracy 66.02 ± 0.16 #25 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs genius GATJK 1:1 Accuracy 56.70 ± 2.07 #26 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs twitch-gamers LINKX 1:1 Accuracy 66.06 ± 0.19 #6 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs twitch-gamers LINK 1:1 Accuracy 64.85 ± 0.21 #13 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs twitch-gamers L Prop 2-hop 1:1 Accuracy 63.88 ± 0.24 #15 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs twitch-gamers GCNJK 1:1 Accuracy 63.45 ± 0.22 #17 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs twitch-gamers L Prop 1-hop 1:1 Accuracy 62.77 ± 0.24 #19 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs twitch-gamers MLP 1:1 Accuracy 60.92 ± 0.07 #23 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs twitch-gamers GATJK 1:1 Accuracy 59.98 ± 2.87 #24 of 26 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections