Papers › Large-Scale Image Retrieval with Attentive Deep Local Features

Large-Scale Image Retrieval with Attentive Deep Local Features

19 Dec 2016ICCV 2017 10arXiv:1612.06321archive 2025-07-28

Hyeonwoo Noh, Andre Araujo, Jack Sim, Tobias Weyand, Bohyung Han

We propose an attentive local feature descriptor suitable for large-scale image retrieval, referred to as DELF (DEep Local Feature). The new feature is based on convolutional neural networks, which are trained only with image-level annotations on a landmark image dataset. To identify semantically useful local features for image retrieval, we also propose an attention mechanism for keypoint selection, which shares most network layers with the descriptor. This framework can be used for image retrieval as a drop-in replacement for other keypoint detectors and descriptors, enabling more accurate feature matching and geometric verification. Our system produces reliable confidence scores to reject false positives---in particular, it is robust against queries that have no correct match in the database. To evaluate the proposed descriptor, we introduce a new large-scale dataset, referred to as Google-Landmarks dataset, which involves challenges in both database and query such as background clutter, partial occlusion, multiple landmarks, objects in variable scales, etc. We show that DELF outperforms the state-of-the-art global and local descriptors in the large-scale setting by significant margins. Code and dataset can be found at the project webpage: https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/research/delf .

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1612.06321")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 9 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 12 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

13 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

tensorflow/models officialmentioned in papertf report
Ash-Lee233/delf mentioned on GitHubmindsporenot reachable when probed 2026-09-17 — repositories for recent papers often appear after camera-ready report
insikk/delf_enhanced mentioned on GitHubtf report
nashory/DeLF-pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
pandigreat/DELF mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
qianlinjun/delf-pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
tensorflow/models mentioned on GitHubtf report
kingcong/delf mindsporenot reachable when probed 2026-09-18 — repositories for recent papers often appear after camera-ready report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

12 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
1ran
9unverified

Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from nashory/DeLF-pytorch. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

find_classes nashory/DeLF-pytorch/extract/folder.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 52d10a10fb72fb9f · report
plot_overlap nashory/DeLF-pytorch/utils/logger.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 50afa2863ffd9fde · report
str2bool nashory/DeLF-pytorch/train/config.py community (archive-listed) ran · violated contract MIT (permissive) · 248284f69adfeaad · report
CalculateKeypointCenters nashory/DeLF-pytorch/helper/delf_helper.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 5981d120f5eb39af · report
CalculateReceptiveBoxes nashory/DeLF-pytorch/helper/delf_helper.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 849ed1ad570b067c · report
GenerateCoordinates nashory/DeLF-pytorch/helper/delf_helper.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 5a69d65b6d87d22f · report
get_inliers nashory/DeLF-pytorch/helper/matcher.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 74aabe4219cf5fe5 · report
get_loader nashory/DeLF-pytorch/train/dataloader.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 7a9dec8d9dfd2eb7 · report
has_file_allowed_extension nashory/DeLF-pytorch/extract/folder.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · e800290c5ea55efd · report
load_image_into_numpy_array nashory/DeLF-pytorch/helper/matcher.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 740767f98e8c32bb · report
make_dataset nashory/DeLF-pytorch/extract/folder.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 100e7ed2b7d0980f · report
read_image nashory/DeLF-pytorch/helper/matcher.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 69b8e79cea9fed25 · report

Tasks

Image RetrievalRetrieval

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

Google Landmarks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Retrieval Oxf105k DELF+FT+ATT+DIR+QE MAP 88.5% #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval Oxf105k DELF+FT+ATT MAP 82.6% #5 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval Oxf5k DELF+FT+ATT+DIR+QE MAP 90.0% #3 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval Oxf5k DELF+FT+ATT MAP 83.8% #5 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval Par106k DELF+FT+ATT+DIR+QE mAP 92.8% #2 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval Par106k DELF+FT+ATT mAP 81.7% #4 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval Par6k DELF+FT+ATT+DIR+QE mAP 95.7% #2 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval Par6k DELF+FT+ATT mAP 85.0% #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) DELF–HQE+SP mAP 50.3 #9 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) DELF–ASMK*+SP mAP 43.1 #11 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) DELF–HQE+SP mAP 73.4 #8 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) DELF–ASMK*+SP mAP 67.8 #10 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) DELF–HQE+SP mAP 69.3 #8 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) DELF–ASMK*+SP mAP 55.4 #12 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) DELF–HQE+SP mAP 84.0 #7 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) DELF–ASMK*+SP mAP 76.9 #11 of 23 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections