Papers › Large problems are not necessarily hard: A case study on distributed NMPC paying off
Large problems are not necessarily hard: A case study on distributed NMPC paying off
Gösta Stomberg, Maurice Raetsch, Alexander Engelmann, Timm Faulwasser
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
A key motivation in the development of Distributed Model Predictive Control (DMPC) is to accelerate centralized Model Predictive Control (MPC) for large-scale systems. DMPC has the prospect of scaling well by parallelizing computations among subsystems. However, communication delays may deteriorate the performance of decentralized optimization, if excessively many iterations are required per control step. Moreover, centralized solvers often exhibit faster asymptotic convergence rates and, by parallelizing costly linear algebra operations, they can also benefit from modern multicore computing architectures. On this canvas, we study the computational performance of cooperative DMPC for linear and nonlinear systems. To this end, we apply a tailored decentralized real-time iteration scheme to frequency control for power systems. DMPC scales well for the considered linear and nonlinear benchmarks, as the iteration number does not depend on the number of subsystems. Comparisons with multi-threaded centralized solvers demonstrate competitive performance of the proposed decentralized optimization algorithms.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections