Papers › LaPose: Laplacian Mixture Shape Modeling for RGB-Based Category-Level Object Pose Estimation

LaPose: Laplacian Mixture Shape Modeling for RGB-Based Category-Level Object Pose Estimation

24 Sep 2024arXiv:2409.15727archive 2025-07-28

Ruida Zhang, Ziqin Huang, Gu Wang, Chenyangguang Zhang, Yan Di, Xingxing Zuo, Jiwen Tang, Xiangyang Ji

While RGBD-based methods for category-level object pose estimation hold promise, their reliance on depth data limits their applicability in diverse scenarios. In response, recent efforts have turned to RGB-based methods; however, they face significant challenges stemming from the absence of depth information. On one hand, the lack of depth exacerbates the difficulty in handling intra-class shape variation, resulting in increased uncertainty in shape predictions. On the other hand, RGB-only inputs introduce inherent scale ambiguity, rendering the estimation of object size and translation an ill-posed problem. To tackle these challenges, we propose LaPose, a novel framework that models the object shape as the Laplacian mixture model for Pose estimation. By representing each point as a probabilistic distribution, we explicitly quantify the shape uncertainty. LaPose leverages both a generalized 3D information stream and a specialized feature stream to independently predict the Laplacian distribution for each point, capturing different aspects of object geometry. These two distributions are then integrated as a Laplacian mixture model to establish the 2D-3D correspondences, which are utilized to solve the pose via the PnP module. In order to mitigate scale ambiguity, we introduce a scale-agnostic representation for object size and translation, enhancing training efficiency and overall robustness. Extensive experiments on the NOCS datasets validate the effectiveness of LaPose, yielding state-of-the-art performance in RGB-based category-level object pose estimation. Codes are released at https://github.com/lolrudy/LaPose

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

12 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from lolrudy/LaPose. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections