Papers › Language Models Hallucinate, but May Excel at Fact Verification

Language Models Hallucinate, but May Excel at Fact Verification

23 Oct 2023arXiv:2310.14564archive 2025-07-28

Jian Guan, Jesse Dodge, David Wadden, Minlie Huang, Hao Peng

Recent progress in natural language processing (NLP) owes much to remarkable advances in large language models (LLMs). Nevertheless, LLMs frequently "hallucinate," resulting in non-factual outputs. Our carefully-designed human evaluation substantiates the serious hallucination issue, revealing that even GPT-3.5 produces factual outputs less than 25% of the time. This underscores the importance of fact verifiers in order to measure and incentivize progress. Our systematic investigation affirms that LLMs can be repurposed as effective fact verifiers with strong correlations with human judgments. Surprisingly, FLAN-T5-11B, the least factual generator in our study, performs the best as a fact verifier, even outperforming more capable LLMs like GPT3.5 and ChatGPT. Delving deeper, we analyze the reliance of these LLMs on high-quality evidence, as well as their deficiencies in robustness and generalization ability. Our study presents insights for developing trustworthy generation models.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2310.14564")

Code

Syntology Ran 6 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 6 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 9 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

jianguanthu/llmforfv officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

6ran
3unverified

Licence: 9 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from jianguanthu/llmforfv. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

acc jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/metric.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 74d38464e5b1a718 · report
compute_precision_recall_per_threshold jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/meta_evaluation_lib.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · ef3019c5908f32d7 · report
expected_calibration_error jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/metric.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 241c78299ce539d4 · report
get_optimal_gmeans_threshold jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/meta_evaluation_lib.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 891a0a1f0f9c0727 · report
get_predicted_labels jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/meta_evaluation_lib.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 49f3a8d4ecf2178f · report
std jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/metric.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 4062d386ad3ef251 · report
completion_with_backoff jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/eval_flant5.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 168cdb58f16242e9 · report
meta_pro_direct jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/meta_eval.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · bc815d8fcd3f6e62 · report
trunct jianguanthu/llmforfv/code/eval_flant5.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · b2cc9b358b0b170f · report

Tasks

Fact VerificationHallucination

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AdamAttentionAttention DropoutBPECosine AnnealingDense ConnectionsDropoutGPT-3Layer NormalizationLinear LayerLinear Warmup With Cosine AnnealingMulti-Head AttentionResidual ConnectionSoftmaxWeight Decay

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections