Papers › Language Identification Using Deep Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks
Language Identification Using Deep Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks
Christian Bartz, Tom Herold, Haojin Yang, Christoph Meinel
Language Identification (LID) systems are used to classify the spoken language from a given audio sample and are typically the first step for many spoken language processing tasks, such as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems. Without automatic language detection, speech utterances cannot be parsed correctly and grammar rules cannot be applied, causing subsequent speech recognition steps to fail. We propose a LID system that solves the problem in the image domain, rather than the audio domain. We use a hybrid Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (CRNN) that operates on spectrogram images of the provided audio snippets. In extensive experiments we show, that our model is applicable to a range of noisy scenarios and can easily be extended to previously unknown languages, while maintaining its classification accuracy. We release our code and a large scale training set for LID systems to the community.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (Background Music) | Inception-v3 CRNN | Accuracy | 0.89 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (Background Music) | Inception-v3 CRNN | F1 Score | 0.89 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (Background Music) | CRNN | Accuracy | 0.70 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (Background Music) | CRNN | F1 Score | 0.70 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (Crackling Noise) | Inception-v3 CRNN | Accuracy | 0.93 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (Crackling Noise) | Inception-v3 CRNN | F1 Score | 0.93 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (Crackling Noise) | CRNN | Accuracy | 0.82 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (Crackling Noise) | CRNN | F1 Score | 0.83 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (No Noise) | Inception-v3 CRNN | Accuracy | 0.96 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (No Noise) | Inception-v3 CRNN | F1 Score | 0.96 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (No Noise) | CRNN | Accuracy | 0.91 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (No Noise) | CRNN | F1 Score | 0.91 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (White Noise) | Inception-v3 CRNN | Accuracy | 0.91 | #2 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (White Noise) | Inception-v3 CRNN | F1 Score | 0.91 | #2 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (White Noise) | CRNN | Accuracy | 0.63 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Spoken language identification | YouTube News dataset (White Noise) | CRNN | F1 Score | 0.63 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections