Papers › Selecting the motion ground truth for loose-fitting wearables: benchmarking optical...
Selecting the motion ground truth for loose-fitting wearables: benchmarking optical MoCap methods
Lala Shakti Swarup Ray, Bo Zhou, Sungho Suh, Paul Lukowicz
To help smart wearable researchers choose the optimal ground truth methods for motion capturing (MoCap) for all types of loose garments, we present a benchmark, DrapeMoCapBench (DMCB), specifically designed to evaluate the performance of optical marker-based and marker-less MoCap. High-cost marker-based MoCap systems are well-known as precise golden standards. However, a less well-known caveat is that they require skin-tight fitting markers on bony areas to ensure the specified precision, making them questionable for loose garments. On the other hand, marker-less MoCap methods powered by computer vision models have matured over the years, which have meager costs as smartphone cameras would suffice. To this end, DMCB uses large real-world recorded MoCap datasets to perform parallel 3D physics simulations with a wide range of diversities: six levels of drape from skin-tight to extremely draped garments, three levels of motions and six body type - gender combinations to benchmark state-of-the-art optical marker-based and marker-less MoCap methods to identify the best-performing method in different scenarios. In assessing the performance of marker-based and low-cost marker-less MoCap for casual loose garments both approaches exhibit significant performance loss (>10cm), but for everyday activities involving basic and fast motions, marker-less MoCap slightly outperforms marker-based MoCap, making it a favorable and cost-effective choice for wearable studies.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections