Papers › Label-Wise Graph Convolutional Network for Heterophilic Graphs
Label-Wise Graph Convolutional Network for Heterophilic Graphs
Enyan Dai, Shijie Zhou, Zhimeng Guo, Suhang Wang
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable performance in modeling graphs for various applications. However, most existing GNNs assume the graphs exhibit strong homophily in node labels, i.e., nodes with similar labels are connected in the graphs. They fail to generalize to heterophilic graphs where linked nodes may have dissimilar labels and attributes. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate a novel framework that performs well on graphs with either homophily or heterophily. More specifically, we propose a label-wise message passing mechanism to avoid the negative effects caused by aggregating dissimilar node representations and preserve the heterophilic contexts for representation learning. We further propose a bi-level optimization method to automatically select the model for graphs with homophily/heterophily. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework for node classification on both homophilic and heterophilic graphs.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node Classification | Chameleon | LW-GCN | Accuracy | 74.4±1.4 | #18 of 61 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Crocodile | LW-GCN | Accuracy | 79.7±0.4 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Squirrel | LW-GCN | Accuracy | 62.6±1.6 | #20 of 59 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Wisconsin | LW-GCN | Accuracy | 86.9±2.2 | #33 of 63 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | arXiv-year | LW-GCN | Accuracy | 55.8±0.2 | #8 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections