Papers › Label Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero- and Few-Shot Relation Extraction
Label Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero- and Few-Shot Relation Extraction
Oscar Sainz, Oier Lopez de Lacalle, Gorka Labaka, Ander Barrena, Eneko Agirre
Relation extraction systems require large amounts of labeled examples which are costly to annotate. In this work we reformulate relation extraction as an entailment task, with simple, hand-made, verbalizations of relations produced in less than 15 min per relation. The system relies on a pretrained textual entailment engine which is run as-is (no training examples, zero-shot) or further fine-tuned on labeled examples (few-shot or fully trained). In our experiments on TACRED we attain 63% F1 zero-shot, 69% with 16 examples per relation (17% points better than the best supervised system on the same conditions), and only 4 points short to the state-of-the-art (which uses 20 times more training data). We also show that the performance can be improved significantly with larger entailment models, up to 12 points in zero-shot, allowing to report the best results to date on TACRED when fully trained. The analysis shows that our few-shot systems are specially effective when discriminating between relations, and that the performance difference in low data regimes comes mainly from identifying no-relation cases.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relation Extraction | TACRED | NLI_DeBERTa | F1 | 73.9 | #11 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Relation Extraction | TACRED | NLI_DeBERTa | F1 (1% Few-Shot) | 63.7 | #11 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Relation Extraction | TACRED | NLI_DeBERTa | F1 (10% Few-Shot) | 67.9 | #11 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Relation Extraction | TACRED | NLI_DeBERTa | F1 (5% Few-Shot) | 69.0 | #11 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Relation Extraction | TACRED | NLI_DeBERTa | F1 (Zero-Shot) | 62.8 | #11 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Relation Extraction | TACRED | NLI_RoBERTa | F1 | 71.0 | #21 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections