Papers › KS(conf ): A Light-Weight Test if a ConvNet Operates Outside of Its Specifications
KS(conf ): A Light-Weight Test if a ConvNet Operates Outside of Its Specifications
Rémy Sun, Christoph H. Lampert
Computer vision systems for automatic image categorization have become accurate and reliable enough that they can run continuously for days or even years as components of real-world commercial applications. A major open problem in this context, however, is quality control. Good classification performance can only be expected if systems run under the specific conditions, in particular data distributions, that they were trained for. Surprisingly, none of the currently used deep network architectures has a built-in functionality that could detect if a network operates on data from a distribution that it was not trained for and potentially trigger a warning to the human users. In this work, we describe KS(conf), a procedure for detecting such outside of the specifications operation. Building on statistical insights, its main step is the applications of a classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to the distribution of predicted confidence values. We show by extensive experiments using ImageNet, AwA2 and DAVIS data on a variety of ConvNets architectures that KS(conf) reliably detects out-of-specs situations. It furthermore has a number of properties that make it an excellent candidate for practical deployment: it is easy to implement, adds almost no overhead to the system, works with all networks, including pretrained ones, and requires no a priori knowledge about how the data distribution could change.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections