Papers › Knowledge-Driven Slot Constraints for Goal-Oriented Dialogue Systems

Knowledge-Driven Slot Constraints for Goal-Oriented Dialogue Systems

1 Jun 2021NAACL 2021 4archive 2025-07-28

Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, Daniele Bonadiman, Saab Mansour

In goal-oriented dialogue systems, users provide information through slot values to achieve specific goals. Practically, some combinations of slot values can be invalid according to external knowledge. For example, a combination of {``}cheese pizza{''} (a menu item) and {``}oreo cookies{''} (a topping) from an input utterance {``}Can I order a cheese pizza with oreo cookies on top?{''} exemplifies such invalid combinations according to the menu of a restaurant business. Traditional dialogue systems allow execution of validation rules as a post-processing step after slots have been filled which can lead to error accumulation. In this paper, we formalize knowledge-driven slot constraints and present a new task of constraint violation detection accompanied with benchmarking data. Then, we propose methods to integrate the external knowledge into the system and model constraint violation detection as an end-to-end classification task and compare it to the traditional rule-based pipeline approach. Experiments on two domains of the MultiDoGO dataset reveal challenges of constraint violation detection and sets the stage for future work and improvements.

PaperPDFCode

Code

amazon-research/nlu-slot-constraints officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BenchmarkingGoal-Oriented Dialogue Systems

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections