Papers › Know Your Limits: Uncertainty Estimation with ReLU Classifiers Fails at Reliable OOD Detection

Know Your Limits: Uncertainty Estimation with ReLU Classifiers Fails at Reliable OOD Detection

9 Dec 2020arXiv:2012.05329archive 2025-07-28

Dennis Ulmer, Giovanni Cinà

A crucial requirement for reliable deployment of deep learning models for safety-critical applications is the ability to identify out-of-distribution (OOD) data points, samples which differ from the training data and on which a model might underperform. Previous work has attempted to tackle this problem using uncertainty estimation techniques. However, there is empirical evidence that a large family of these techniques do not detect OOD reliably in classification tasks. This paper gives a theoretical explanation for said experimental findings and illustrates it on synthetic data. We prove that such techniques are not able to reliably identify OOD samples in a classification setting, since their level of confidence is generalized to unseen areas of the feature space. This result stems from the interplay between the representation of ReLU networks as piece-wise affine transformations, the saturating nature of activation functions like softmax, and the most widely-used uncertainty metrics.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

Kaleidophon/know-your-limits officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

General ClassificationOut of Distribution (OOD) Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

ReLU

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections