Papers › To Ensemble or Not Ensemble: When does End-To-End Training Fail?

To Ensemble or Not Ensemble: When does End-To-End Training Fail?

12 Feb 2019arXiv:1902.04422archive 2025-07-28

Andrew M. Webb, Charles Reynolds, Wenlin Chen, Henry Reeve, Dan-Andrei Iliescu, Mikel Lujan, Gavin Brown

End-to-End training (E2E) is becoming more and more popular to train complex Deep Network architectures. An interesting question is whether this trend will continue-are there any clear failure cases for E2E training? We study this question in depth, for the specific case of E2E training an ensemble of networks. Our strategy is to blend the gradient smoothly in between two extremes: from independent training of the networks, up to to full E2E training. We find clear failure cases, where over-parameterized models cannot be trained E2E. A surprising result is that the optimum can sometimes lie in between the two, neither an ensemble or an E2E system. The work also uncovers links to Dropout, and raises questions around the nature of ensemble diversity and multi-branch networks.

PaperPDFCode

Code

grey-area/modular-loss-experiments officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Diversity

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionAverage PoolingBatch NormalizationConvolutionGlobal Average PoolingGrouped ConvolutionKaiming InitializationReLUResNeXtResNeXt BlockResidual Connection

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections