Papers › Joint Token Pruning and Squeezing Towards More Aggressive Compression of Vision Transformers
Joint Token Pruning and Squeezing Towards More Aggressive Compression of Vision Transformers
Siyuan Wei, Tianzhu Ye, Shen Zhang, Yao Tang, Jiajun Liang
Although vision transformers (ViTs) have shown promising results in various computer vision tasks recently, their high computational cost limits their practical applications. Previous approaches that prune redundant tokens have demonstrated a good trade-off between performance and computation costs. Nevertheless, errors caused by pruning strategies can lead to significant information loss. Our quantitative experiments reveal that the impact of pruned tokens on performance should be noticeable. To address this issue, we propose a novel joint Token Pruning & Squeezing module (TPS) for compressing vision transformers with higher efficiency. Firstly, TPS adopts pruning to get the reserved and pruned subsets. Secondly, TPS squeezes the information of pruned tokens into partial reserved tokens via the unidirectional nearest-neighbor matching and similarity-based fusing steps. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, our approach outperforms them under all token pruning intensities. Especially while shrinking DeiT-tiny&small computational budgets to 35%, it improves the accuracy by 1%-6% compared with baselines on ImageNet classification. The proposed method can accelerate the throughput of DeiT-small beyond DeiT-tiny, while its accuracy surpasses DeiT-tiny by 4.78%. Experiments on various transformers demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, while analysis experiments prove our higher robustness to the errors of the token pruning policy. Code is available at https://github.com/megvii-research/TPS-CVPR2023.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2304.10716")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 6 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
8 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from megvii-research/TPS-CVPR2023. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
908619be92da9903 · report
3913c620f6926f42 · report
0d5eb6177974e3b2 · report
3bc74137ab36aa79 · report
427f72651ff7cfa0 · report
7026a4f946a4f7a3 · report
c0d55edbcda649c3 · report
b31af37bba5ce554 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | dTPS | GFLOPs | 3.8 | #15 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | dTPS | Top 1 Accuracy | 82.6 | #15 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | eTPS | GFLOPs | 3.8 | #17 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | eTPS | Top 1 Accuracy | 82.5 | #17 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | dTPS | GFLOPs | 3.0 | #2 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | dTPS | Top 1 Accuracy | 80.1 | #2 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | eTPS | GFLOPs | 3.0 | #14 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | eTPS | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.7 | #14 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | dTPS | GFLOPs | 0.8 | #1 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | dTPS | Top 1 Accuracy | 72.9 | #1 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | eTPS | GFLOPs | 0.8 | #5 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | eTPS | Top 1 Accuracy | 72.3 | #5 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections