Papers › Impact of Jittering on Raster- and Distance-based Geostatistical Analyses of DHS Data
Impact of Jittering on Raster- and Distance-based Geostatistical Analyses of DHS Data
Umut Altay, John Paige, Andrea Riebler, Geir-Arne Fuglstad
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Fine-scale covariate rasters are routinely used in geostatistical models for mapping demographic and health indicators based on household surveys from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) program. However, the geostatistical analyses ignore the fact that GPS coordinates in DHS surveys are jittered for privacy purposes. We demonstrate the need to account for this jittering, and we propose a computationally efficient approach that can be routinely applied. We use the new method to analyse the prevalence of completion of secondary education for 20--49 year old women in Nigeria in 2018 based on the 2018 DHS survey. The analysis demonstrates substantial changes in the estimates of spatial range and fixed effects compared to when we ignore jittering. Through a simulation study that mimics the dataset, we demonstrate that accounting for jittering reduces attenuation in the estimated coefficients for covariates and improves predictions. The results also show that the common approach of averaging covariate values in windows around the observed locations does not lead to the same improvements as accounting for jittering.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections