Papers › JigSaw: Boosting Fidelity of NISQ Programs via Measurement Subsetting
JigSaw: Boosting Fidelity of NISQ Programs via Measurement Subsetting
Poulami Das, Swamit Tannu, Moinuddin Qureshi
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Near-term quantum computers contain noisy devices, which makes it difficult to infer the correct answer even if a program is run for thousands of trials. On current machines, qubit measurements tend to be the most error-prone operations (with an average error-rate of 4%) and often limit the size of quantum programs that can be run reliably on these systems. As quantum programs create and manipulate correlated states, all the program qubits are measured in each trial and thus, the severity of measurement errors increases with the program size. The fidelity of quantum programs can be improved by reducing the number of measurement operations. We present JigSaw, a framework that reduces the impact of measurement errors by running a program in two modes. First, running the entire program and measuring all the qubits for half of the trials to produce a global (albeit noisy) histogram. Second, running additional copies of the program and measuring only a subset of qubits in each copy, for the remaining trials, to produce localized (higher fidelity) histograms over the measured qubits. JigSaw then employs a Bayesian post-processing step, whereby the histograms produced by the subset measurements are used to update the global histogram. Our evaluations using three different IBM quantum computers with 27 and 65 qubits show that JigSaw improves the success rate on average by 3.6x and up-to 8.4x. Our analysis shows that the storage and time complexity of JigSaw scales linearly with the number of qubits and trials, making JigSaw applicable to programs with hundreds of qubits.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections