Papers › Iterative Manifold Embedding Layer Learned by Incomplete Data for Large-scale Image Retrieval
Iterative Manifold Embedding Layer Learned by Incomplete Data for Large-scale Image Retrieval
Jian Xu, Chunheng Wang, Chengzuo Qi, Cunzhao Shi, Baihua Xiao
Existing manifold learning methods are not appropriate for image retrieval task, because most of them are unable to process query image and they have much additional computational cost especially for large scale database. Therefore, we propose the iterative manifold embedding (IME) layer, of which the weights are learned off-line by unsupervised strategy, to explore the intrinsic manifolds by incomplete data. On the large scale database that contains 27000 images, IME layer is more than 120 times faster than other manifold learning methods to embed the original representations at query time. We embed the original descriptors of database images which lie on manifold in a high dimensional space into manifold-based representations iteratively to generate the IME representations in off-line learning stage. According to the original descriptors and the IME representations of database images, we estimate the weights of IME layer by ridge regression. In on-line retrieval stage, we employ the IME layer to map the original representation of query image with ignorable time cost (2 milliseconds). We experiment on five public standard datasets for image retrieval. The proposed IME layer significantly outperforms related dimension reduction methods and manifold learning methods. Without post-processing, Our IME layer achieves a boost in performance of state-of-the-art image retrieval methods with post-processing on most datasets, and needs less computational cost.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Retrieval | INSTRE | IME layer | MAP | 82.4 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Oxf105k | CNN+IME layer | MAP | 87.2% | #4 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Oxf105k | SIFT+IME layer | MAP | 31.3% | #9 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Oxf5k | CNN+IME layer | MAP | 92% | #2 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Oxf5k | IME | MAP | 83.5% | #6 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Oxf5k | PCA [51] | MAP | 82.6% | #8 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Oxf5k | IsoMap [32] | MAP | 77.9% | #9 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Oxf5k | SIFT+IME layer | MAP | 62.2% | #10 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Oxf5k | LLE [33] | MAP | 51.7% | #11 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Retrieval | Paris6k | IME layer | mAP | 96.6 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections