Papers › Is Machine Learning in Power Systems Vulnerable?
Is Machine Learning in Power Systems Vulnerable?
Yize Chen, Yushi Tan, Deepjyoti Deka
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Recent advances in Machine Learning(ML) have led to its broad adoption in a series of power system applications, ranging from meter data analytics, renewable/load/price forecasting to grid security assessment. Although these data-driven methods yield state-of-the-art performances in many tasks, the robustness and security of applying such algorithms in modern power grids have not been discussed. In this paper, we attempt to address the issues regarding the security of ML applications in power systems. We first show that most of the current ML algorithms proposed in power systems are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which are maliciously crafted input data. We then adopt and extend a simple yet efficient algorithm for finding subtle perturbations, which could be used for generating adversaries for both categorical(e.g., user load profile classification) and sequential applications(e.g., renewables generation forecasting). Case studies on classification of power quality disturbances and forecast of building loads demonstrate the vulnerabilities of current ML algorithms in power networks under our adversarial designs. These vulnerabilities call for design of robust and secure ML algorithms for real world applications.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections