Papers › Inversion-Free Image Editing with Natural Language
Inversion-Free Image Editing with Natural Language
Sihan Xu, Yidong Huang, Jiayi Pan, Ziqiao Ma, Joyce Chai
Despite recent advances in inversion-based editing, text-guided image manipulation remains challenging for diffusion models. The primary bottlenecks include 1) the time-consuming nature of the inversion process; 2) the struggle to balance consistency with accuracy; 3) the lack of compatibility with efficient consistency sampling methods used in consistency models. To address the above issues, we start by asking ourselves if the inversion process can be eliminated for editing. We show that when the initial sample is known, a special variance schedule reduces the denoising step to the same form as the multi-step consistency sampling. We name this Denoising Diffusion Consistent Model (DDCM), and note that it implies a virtual inversion strategy without explicit inversion in sampling. We further unify the attention control mechanisms in a tuning-free framework for text-guided editing. Combining them, we present inversion-free editing (InfEdit), which allows for consistent and faithful editing for both rigid and non-rigid semantic changes, catering to intricate modifications without compromising on the image's integrity and explicit inversion. Through extensive experiments, InfEdit shows strong performance in various editing tasks and also maintains a seamless workflow (less than 3 seconds on one single A40), demonstrating the potential for real-time applications. Project Page: https://sled-group.github.io/InfEdit/
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2312.04965")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract.
By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from sled-group/InfEdit. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
9041992d3fb5205d · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Unified Attention Control+LCM | Background LPIPS | 47.58 | #2 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Unified Attention Control+LCM | Background PSNR | 28.51 | #2 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Unified Attention Control+LCM | CLIPSIM | 25.03 | #2 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Unified Attention Control+LCM | Structure Distance | 13.78 | #2 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Prompt-to-Prompt | Background LPIPS | 47.98 | #4 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Prompt-to-Prompt | Background PSNR | 27.52 | #4 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Prompt-to-Prompt | CLIPSIM | 24.89 | #4 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Prompt-to-Prompt | Structure Distance | 14.22 | #4 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Prompt-to-Prompt+LCM | Background LPIPS | 55.85 | #7 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Prompt-to-Prompt+LCM | Background PSNR | 26.64 | #7 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Prompt-to-Prompt+LCM | CLIPSIM | 24.57 | #7 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text-based Image Editing | PIE-Bench | Virtual Inversion+Prompt-to-Prompt+LCM | Structure Distance | 15.61 | #7 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections