Papers › Interpretable3D: An Ad-Hoc Interpretable Classifier for 3D Point Clouds
Interpretable3D: An Ad-Hoc Interpretable Classifier for 3D Point Clouds
Tuo Feng, Ruijie Quan, Xiaohan Wang, Wenguan Wang, Yi Yang
3D decision-critical tasks urgently require research on explanations to ensure system reliability and transparency. Extensive explanatory research has been conducted on 2D images, but there is a lack in the 3D field. Furthermore, the existing explanations for 3D models are post-hoc and can be misleading, as they separate explanations from the original model. To address these issues, we propose an ad-hoc interpretable classifier for 3D point clouds (i.e., Interpretable3D). As an intuitive case-based classifier, Interpretable3D can provide reliable ad-hoc explanations without any embarrassing nuances. It allows users to understand how queries are embedded within past observations in prototype sets. Interpretable3D has two iterative training steps: 1) updating one prototype with the mean of the embeddings within the same sub-class in Prototype Estimation, and 2) penalizing or rewarding the estimated prototypes in Prototype Optimization. The mean of embeddings has a clear statistical meaning, i.e., class sub-centers. Moreover, we update prototypes with their most similar observations in the last few epochs. Finally, Interpretable3D classifies new samples according to prototypes. We evaluate the performance of Interpretable3D on four popular point cloud models: DGCNN, PointNet2, PointMLP, and PointNeXt. Our Interpretable3D demonstrates comparable or superior performance compared to softmax-based black-box models in the tasks of 3D shape classification and part segmentation.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections