Papers › Interaction Relational Network for Mutual Action Recognition
Interaction Relational Network for Mutual Action Recognition
Mauricio Perez, Jun Liu, Alex C. Kot
Person-person mutual action recognition (also referred to as interaction recognition) is an important research branch of human activity analysis. Current solutions in the field -- mainly dominated by CNNs, GCNs and LSTMs -- often consist of complicated architectures and mechanisms to embed the relationships between the two persons on the architecture itself, to ensure the interaction patterns can be properly learned. Our main contribution with this work is by proposing a simpler yet very powerful architecture, named Interaction Relational Network, which utilizes minimal prior knowledge about the structure of the human body. We drive the network to identify by itself how to relate the body parts from the individuals interacting. In order to better represent the interaction, we define two different relationships, leading to specialized architectures and models for each. These multiple relationship models will then be fused into a single and special architecture, in order to leverage both streams of information for further enhancing the relational reasoning capability. Furthermore we define important structured pair-wise operations to extract meaningful extra information from each pair of joints -- distance and motion. Ultimately, with the coupling of an LSTM, our IRN is capable of paramount sequential relational reasoning. These important extensions we made to our network can also be valuable to other problems that require sophisticated relational reasoning. Our solution is able to achieve state-of-the-art performance on the traditional interaction recognition datasets SBU and UT, and also on the mutual actions from the large-scale dataset NTU RGB+D. Furthermore, it obtains competitive performance in the NTU RGB+D 120 dataset interactions subset.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1910.04963")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from mauriciolp/inter-rel-net. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
d2e9220a44032c76 · report
29eba85d6d5181d1 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Interaction Recognition | NTU RGB+D | LSTM-IRN'fc1inter+intra | Accuracy (Cross-Subject) | 90.5 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Human Interaction Recognition | NTU RGB+D | LSTM-IRN'fc1inter+intra | Accuracy (Cross-View) | 93.5 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Human Interaction Recognition | NTU RGB+D 120 | LSTM-IRN | Accuracy (Cross-Setup) | 79.6 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Human Interaction Recognition | NTU RGB+D 120 | LSTM-IRN | Accuracy (Cross-Subject) | 77.7 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Human Interaction Recognition | SBU | LSTM-IRN'fc1inter+intra | Accuracy | 98.2 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Human Interaction Recognition | UT-Interaction | LSTM-IRN'fc1inter+intra | Accuracy (Set 1) | 98.3 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Human Interaction Recognition | UT-Interaction | LSTM-IRN'fc1inter+intra | Accuracy (Set 2) | 96.7 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections