Papers › Integrating Multi-view Analysis: Multi-view Mixture-of-Expert for Textual Personality Detection

Integrating Multi-view Analysis: Multi-view Mixture-of-Expert for Textual Personality Detection

16 Aug 2024arXiv:2408.08551archive 2025-07-28

Haohao Zhu, Xiaokun Zhang, Junyu Lu, Liang Yang, Hongfei Lin

Textual personality detection aims to identify personality traits by analyzing user-generated content. To achieve this effectively, it is essential to thoroughly examine user-generated content from various perspectives. However, previous studies have struggled with automatically extracting and effectively integrating information from multiple perspectives, thereby limiting their performance on personality detection. To address these challenges, we propose the Multi-view Mixture-of-Experts Model for Textual Personality Detection (MvP). MvP introduces a Multi-view Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) network to automatically analyze user posts from various perspectives. Additionally, it employs User Consistency Regularization to mitigate conflicts among different perspectives and learn a multi-view generic user representation. The model's training is optimized via a multi-task joint learning strategy that balances supervised personality detection with self-supervised user consistency constraints. Experimental results on two widely-used personality detection datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the MvP model and the benefits of automatically analyzing user posts from diverse perspectives for textual personality detection.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Hugo-Zhu/MvP officialpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Mixture-of-Experts

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections