Papers › Instruction-driven history-aware policies for robotic manipulations
Instruction-driven history-aware policies for robotic manipulations
Pierre-Louis Guhur, ShiZhe Chen, Ricardo Garcia, Makarand Tapaswi, Ivan Laptev, Cordelia Schmid
In human environments, robots are expected to accomplish a variety of manipulation tasks given simple natural language instructions. Yet, robotic manipulation is extremely challenging as it requires fine-grained motor control, long-term memory as well as generalization to previously unseen tasks and environments. To address these challenges, we propose a unified transformer-based approach that takes into account multiple inputs. In particular, our transformer architecture integrates (i) natural language instructions and (ii) multi-view scene observations while (iii) keeping track of the full history of observations and actions. Such an approach enables learning dependencies between history and instructions and improves manipulation precision using multiple views. We evaluate our method on the challenging RLBench benchmark and on a real-world robot. Notably, our approach scales to 74 diverse RLBench tasks and outperforms the state of the art. We also address instruction-conditioned tasks and demonstrate excellent generalization to previously unseen variations.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2209.04899")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 11 have no recorded run.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 11 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
11 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 11 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from guhur/hiveformer. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
272295b2b14c060e · report
7d979f85e8121f26 · report
e08b3437c448bb17 · report
33a28f41002690b5 · report
1eb3169facaa8376 · report
1441fd48c61694c2 · report
17bfe81c047d25b6 · report
bad211cd427d59bf · report
082118868638dd54 · report
e03456c6ae93a8de · report
4d877f2e65b9850e · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robot Manipulation | RLBench | Hiveformer | Succ. Rate (10 tasks, 100 demos/task) | 83.3 | #13 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Robot Manipulation | RLBench | Hiveformer | Succ. Rate (18 tasks, 100 demo/task) | 45.3 | #13 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Robot Manipulation Generalization | GEMBench | Hiveformer | Average Success Rate | 30.4 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Robot Manipulation Generalization | GEMBench | Hiveformer | Average Success Rate (L1) | 60.3±1.5 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Robot Manipulation Generalization | GEMBench | Hiveformer | Average Success Rate (L2) | 26.1±1.4 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Robot Manipulation Generalization | GEMBench | Hiveformer | Average Success Rate (L3) | 35.1±1.7 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Robot Manipulation Generalization | GEMBench | Hiveformer | Average Success Rate (L4) | 0.0±0.0 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections