Papers › Insights into Binary Neutron Star Merger Simulations: A Multi-Code Comparison
Insights into Binary Neutron Star Merger Simulations: A Multi-Code Comparison
Maria C. Babiuc Hamilton, William A. Messman
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Gravitational Wave (GW) signals from Binary Neutron Star (BNS) mergers provide critical insights into the properties of matter under extreme conditions. Due to the scarcity of observational data, Numerical Relativity (NR) simulations are indispensable for exploring these phenomena. However, simulating BNS mergers is a formidable challenge, and ensuring the consistency, reliability or convergence, especially in the post-merger, remains a work in progress. In this paper we assess the performance of current BNS merger simulations by analyzing open-source GW waveforms from five leading NR codes - SACRA, BAM, THC, Whisky amd SpEC. We focus on the accuracy of these simulations and on the effect of the equation of state (EOS) on waveform predictions. We first check if different codes give similar results for similar initial data, then apply two methods to calculate convergence and quantify discretization errors. Lastly, we perform a thorough investigation into the effect of tidal interactions on key frequencies in the GW spectrum. We introduce a novel quasi-universal relation for the transient post-merger time, enhancing our understanding of remnant dynamics in this region. This detailed analysis clarifies agreements and discrepancies between these leading NR codes, and highlights necessary improvements for the advanced accuracy requirements of future GW detectors.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections