Papers › InsightiGen: a versatile tool to generate insight for an academic systematic literature review
InsightiGen: a versatile tool to generate insight for an academic systematic literature review
Ardeshir Shojaeinasab, Masoud Jalayer, Homayoun Najjaran
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
A comprehensive literature review has always been an essential first step of every meaningful research. In recent years, however, the availability of a vast amount of information in both open-access and subscription-based literature in every field has made it difficult, if not impossible, to be certain about the comprehensiveness of one's survey. This subsequently can lead to reviewers' questioning of the novelties of the research directions proposed, regardless of the quality of the actual work presented. In this situation, statistics derived from the published literature data can provide valuable quantitative and visual information about research trends, knowledge gaps, and research networks and hubs in different fields. Our tool provides an automatic and rapid way of generating insight for systematic reviews in any research area.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections