Papers › Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative models

Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative models

25 Sep 2019ICLR 2020 1arXiv:1909.11480archive 2025-07-28

Joan Serrà, David Álvarez, Vicenç Gómez, Olga Slizovskaia, José F. Núñez, Jordi Luque

Likelihood-based generative models are a promising resource to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs which could compromise the robustness or reliability of a machine learning system. However, likelihoods derived from such models have been shown to be problematic for detecting certain types of inputs that significantly differ from training data. In this paper, we pose that this problem is due to the excessive influence that input complexity has in generative models' likelihoods. We report a set of experiments supporting this hypothesis, and use an estimate of input complexity to derive an efficient and parameter-free OOD score, which can be seen as a likelihood-ratio, akin to Bayesian model comparison. We find such score to perform comparably to, or even better than, existing OOD detection approaches under a wide range of data sets, models, model sizes, and complexity estimates.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

gfloto/tilted_prior mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Anomaly DetectionOut of Distribution (OOD) DetectionOut-of-Distribution Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Anomaly Detection Unlabeled CIFAR-10 vs CIFAR-100 Input Complexity (Glow) AUROC 73.6 #10 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection Unlabeled CIFAR-10 vs CIFAR-100 Likelihood (Glow) AUROC 58.2 #11 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection Unlabeled CIFAR-10 vs CIFAR-100 Input Complexity (PixelCNN++) AUROC 53.5 #12 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection Unlabeled CIFAR-10 vs CIFAR-100 Likelihood (PixelCNN++) AUROC 52.6 #13 of 13 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections