Papers › Initial recommendations for performing, benchmarking, and reporting single-cell...

Initial recommendations for performing, benchmarking, and reporting single-cell proteomics experiments

19 Jul 2022arXiv:2207.10815archive 2025-07-28

Laurent Gatto, Ruedi Aebersold, Juergen Cox, Vadim Demichev, Jason Derks, Edward Emmott, Alexander M. Franks, Alexander R. Ivanov, Ryan T. Kelly, Luke Khoury, Andrew Leduc, Michael J. MacCoss, Peter Nemes, David H. Perlman, Aleksandra A. Petelski, Christopher M. Rose, Erwin M. Schoof, Jennifer Van Eyk, Christophe Vanderaa, John R. Yates III, Nikolai Slavov

Analyzing proteins from single cells by tandem mass spectrometry (MS) has become technically feasible. While such analysis has the potential to accurately quantify thousands of proteins across thousands of single cells, the accuracy and reproducibility of the results may be undermined by numerous factors affecting experimental design, sample preparation, data acquisition, and data analysis. Broadly accepted community guidelines and standardized metrics will enhance rigor, data quality, and alignment between laboratories. Here we propose best practices, quality controls, and data reporting recommendations to assist in the broad adoption of reliable quantitative workflows for single-cell proteomics.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

slavovlab/scp_recommendations officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BenchmarkingExperimental Design

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections