Papers › Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning
Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning
Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng, John Preskill
We study the performance of classical and quantum machine learning (ML) models in predicting outcomes of physical experiments. The experiments depend on an input parameter x and involve execution of a (possibly unknown) quantum process ℰ. Our figure of merit is the number of runs of ℰ required to achieve a desired prediction performance. We consider classical ML models that perform a measurement and record the classical outcome after each run of ℰ, and quantum ML models that can access ℰ coherently to acquire quantum data; the classical or quantum data is then used to predict outcomes of future experiments. We prove that for any input distribution 𝒟(x), a classical ML model can provide accurate predictions on average by accessing ℰ a number of times comparable to the optimal quantum ML model. In contrast, for achieving accurate prediction on all inputs, we prove that exponential quantum advantage is possible. For example, to predict expectations of all Pauli observables in an n-qubit system ρ, classical ML models require 2^(Ω(n)) copies of ρ, but we present a quantum ML model using only 𝒪(n) copies. Our results clarify where quantum advantage is possible and highlight the potential for classical ML models to address challenging quantum problems in physics and chemistry.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections