Papers › Influence of uncertainty estimation techniques on false-positive reduction in liver...

Influence of uncertainty estimation techniques on false-positive reduction in liver lesion detection

22 Jun 2022arXiv:2206.10911archive 2025-07-28

Ishaan Bhat, Josien P. W. Pluim, Max A. Viergever, Hugo J. Kuijf

Deep learning techniques show success in detecting objects in medical images, but still suffer from false-positive predictions that may hinder accurate diagnosis. The estimated uncertainty of the neural network output has been used to flag incorrect predictions. We study the role played by features computed from neural network uncertainty estimates and shape-based features computed from binary predictions in reducing false positives in liver lesion detection by developing a classification-based post-processing step for different uncertainty estimation methods. We demonstrate an improvement in the lesion detection performance of the neural network (with respect to F1-score) for all uncertainty estimation methods on two datasets, comprising abdominal MR and CT images, respectively. We show that features computed from neural network uncertainty estimates tend not to contribute much toward reducing false positives. Our results show that factors like class imbalance (true over false positive ratio) and shape-based features extracted from uncertainty maps play an important role in distinguishing false positive from true positive predictions. Our code can be found at https://github.com/ishaanb92/FPCPipeline.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ishaanb92/fpcpipeline officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Lesion Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections