Papers › Inequity aversion reduces travel time in the traffic light control problem

Inequity aversion reduces travel time in the traffic light control problem

23 Feb 2023arXiv:2302.12053links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Mersad Hassanjani, Farinaz Alamiyan-Harandi, Pouria Ramazi

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The traffic light control problem is to improve the traffic flow by coordinating between the traffic lights. Recently, a successful deep reinforcement learning model, CoLight, was developed to capture the influences of neighboring intersections by a graph attention network. We propose IACoLight that boosts up to 11.4% the performance of CoLight by incorporating the Inequity Aversion (IA) model that reshapes each agent's reward by adding or subtracting advantageous or disadvantageous reward inequities compared to other agents. Unlike in the other applications of IA, where both advantageous and disadvantageous inequities are punished by considering negative coefficients, we allowed them to be also rewarded and explored a range of both positive and negative coefficients. Our experiments demonstrated that making CoLight agents averse to inequities improved the vehicles' average travel time and rewarding rather than punishing advantageous inequities enhanced the results.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mersadhj/iacolight officialmentioned in papertf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections