Papers › Incremental Learning in Person Re-Identification
Incremental Learning in Person Re-Identification
Prajjwal Bhargava
Person Re-Identification is still a challenging task in Computer Vision due to a variety of reasons. On the other side, Incremental Learning is still an issue since deep learning models tend to face the problem of over catastrophic forgetting when trained on subsequent tasks. In this paper, we propose a model that can be used for multiple tasks in Person Re-Identification, provide state-of-the-art results on a variety of tasks and still achieve considerable accuracy subsequently. We evaluated our model on two datasets Market 1501 and Duke MTMC. Extensive experiments show that this method can achieve Incremental Learning in Person ReID efficiently as well as for other tasks in computer vision as well.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person Re-Identification | DukeMTMC-reID | Incremental Learning | Rank-1 | 80.0 | #73 of 94 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | DukeMTMC-reID | Incremental Learning | mAP | 60.2 | #73 of 94 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | Market-1501 | Incremental Learning | Rank-1 | 89.3 | #97 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | Market-1501 | Incremental Learning | mAP | 71.8 | #97 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections