Papers › Increased earthquake rate prior to mainshocks
Increased earthquake rate prior to mainshocks
Eitan E. Asher, Shlomo Havlin, Shay Moshel, Yosef Ashkenazy
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
According to the Omori-Utsu law, the rate of aftershocks after a mainshock decays as a power law with an exponent close to 1. This well-established law was intensively used in the past to study and model the statistical properties of earthquakes. Moreover, according to the so-called inverse Omori law, the rate of earthquakes should also increase prior to a mainshock -- this law has received much less attention due to its large uncertainty. Here, we mainly study the inverse Omori law based on a highly detailed Southern California earthquake catalog, which is complete for magnitudes larger than M>0.3. First, we develop a technique to identify mainshocks, foreshocks, and aftershocks. We then find, based on a statistical procedure we developed, that the rate of earthquakes is higher a few days prior to a mainshock. We find that this increase is much smaller for a catalog with a magnitude threshold of m over 2.5 and for the Epidemic-Type Aftershocks Sequence (ETAS) model catalogs, even when used with a small magnitude threshold. We also analyze the rate of aftershocks after mainshocks and find that the Omori-Utsu law does not hold for many individual mainshocks and that it may be valid only statistically when considering many mainshocks together. Yet, the analysis of the ETAS model based on the Omori-Utsu law exhibits similar behavior as that of the real catalogs, indicating the validity of this law.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections